1. Accueil
  2. FR
  3. Étudier
  4. Offre de formation
  5. UE
SAPU-L6527

Protocol development and health examination survey

année académique
2025-2026

Titulaire(s) du cours

Katia CASTETBON (Coordonnateur)

Crédits ECTS

2

Langue(s) d'enseignement

anglais

Contenu du cours

Survey methods, including health examination surveys.

Objectifs (et/ou acquis d'apprentissages spécifiques)

  • To provide students with a theoretical framework (methodology) and tools (methods)
  • To develop their skills in choosing research methods
  • To develop an integrated approach to other learning activities (qualitative and quantitative methods)
  • To master the basic techniques of the hypothetical-deductive approach
  • To develop different techniques for the elaboration of a research work
  • To apply ethical rules to research protocol
  • To develop quality process in carrying out data collection, including health examination surveys.

Méthodes d'enseignement et activités d'apprentissages

On site and via Teams platform: state of the art courses, practical applications (questionnaire development, consent form writing, sampling plan…).

Références, bibliographie et lectures recommandées

  • Bowling, A.; Ebrahim, S. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of health research methods. OUP.
  • Braekman, E., Berete, F., Charafeddine, R., Demarest, S., Drieskens, S., Gisle, L., Van Hal, G. (2018). Measurement agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the belgian health interview survey: Paper-and-pencil versus web-based mode. PLoS ONE, 13(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197434
  • Clark, J. P. (2000). Balancing Qualitative & Quantitative Methodology in Health Services Research: 33.
  • Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166.e7-166.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
  • Grogan, S., Conner, M., Norman, P., Willits, D., & Porter, I. (2000). Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. Quality in Health Care, 9(4), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.4.210
  • Kawachi, I.; Subramanian, S.; Kim, D. (eds). (2008). Social Capital and Health. Springer.
  • Mellenbergh, G. J., Adèr, H. J., Baird, D., Berger, M. P. F., Cornell, J. E., Hagenaars, J. A. P., Cornell, J. E. (2003). -Conceptual Issues of Research Methodology for the Behavioural , Life and Social Sciences Wiley for the Royal Statistical Society, 52(2), 211–218.
  • Ulrika, Ö.; Kidd, L.; Wengström, Y. . (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369–383.
  • Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/pdf/jadp-06-168.pdf
  • Stern, M. J., Bilgen, I., & Dillman, D. A. (2014). The State of Survey Methodology: Challenges, Dilemmas, and New Frontiers in the Era of the Tailored Design. Field Methods, 26(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X13519561
  • Wright, S., O’Brien, B. C., Nimmon, L., Law, M., & Mylopoulos, M. (2016). Research Design Considerations. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(1), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00566.1

Support(s) de cours

  • Université virtuelle
  • Podcast

Autres renseignements

Contacts

Nicolas Berger : nicolas.berger@ulb.be 
Katia Castetbon : katia.castetbon@ulb.be

Campus

Erasme

Evaluation

Méthode(s) d'évaluation

  • Présentation orale
  • Travail de groupe

Présentation orale

Travail de groupe

  • Intermediate in-group works for Health examination surveys.
  • Final in-group work on developing a research protocol (including appendices such as a questionnaire, consent form…). Final report will be submitted in the January exam's session

Construction de la note (en ce compris, la pondération des notes partielles)

Intermediate in-group works for Health examination surveys: 15/100 points.

Protocol: written report (85/100 points).

When the unit is not validated at the first session (<10/20), points coming from intermediate in-group works will be reported at the 2nd session (15/100). Some parts of the protocol (written report) on another topic will be asked to retake at the second session and marked on 85/100 points.

Langue(s) d'évaluation

  • anglais

Programmes